Tackling Bias Head-On: ONA's Impact on Performance Reviews

Why is addressing biases in the performance review important?

Performance reviews are a cornerstone of employee development and organizational growth. They provide a platform for managers and employees to discuss achievements, set future goals, and address areas of improvement. However, traditional methods of performance reviews have shown significant limitations. Research indicates that 60% of a manager's performance rating is influenced by bias, with only 20% of performance feedback reflecting the actual performance of the employee. This discrepancy can lead to misjudgments, affecting employee morale, retention, and overall productivity.

The Problem with Performance Appraisals

Traditional performance appraisals often suffer from various biases, leading to skewed results. These biases can arise from a manager's personal perceptions, recent events, rating biases, or even societal stereotypes. Biases in performance reviews can lead to unfair evaluations, affecting employee morale, growth opportunities, and overall organizational health. Addressing these biases ensures that employees are evaluated based on their actual performance, fostering a culture of trust and meritocracy.

Types of Bias That Impact Performance Appraisals

Halo Bias:

This occurs when a positive trait of an employee influences the overall assessment, overshadowing areas that might need improvement.

Recency Bias:

Managers tend to remember recent events more clearly. This bias in performance reviews leads to evaluations based on recent achievements or mistakes rather than the entire review period.

Halo Effect:

Similar to halo bias, this attribution bias is when one positive quality of an employee influences the overall perception of their performance.

Leniency Bias:

Some managers tend to be overly generous in their own performance evaluations too, which can mask areas of improvement.

Idiosyncratic Rater Bias:

This happens when a manager's personal rating style or evaluation criteria also affects the evaluation, rather than basing it on actual performance.

Horns Effect:

Opposite of the halo effect, this is when one negative trait affects the overall assessment of an employee.

Gender Bias:

Evaluations influenced by gender stereotypes rather than actual performance.

Law of Small Numbers Bias:

Making assumptions about an employee's past performance is based on a small amount of data or isolated incidents.

The Costly Consequences of Unfair Appraisals

Unfair appraisals can demotivate employees, reduce trust in performance management process, and lead to increased turnover. It can also hinder the growth of deserving employees and fail to provide necessary feedback to those who need improvement.

Performance appraisals, when done right, can be a powerful tool for employee growth and organizational development. However, when biases creep into these performance evaluations, the repercussions and serious implications of bias can be far-reaching and costly.

The Recency Effect in Action

Consider the case of Emily, a dedicated employee who consistently met her targets and collaborated effectively with her team throughout the year. However, a month before her performance appraisal, she faced personal challenges that momentarily affected her performance. During her review, her manager focused heavily on this short period of underperformance, overlooking her contributions for the rest of the year. As a result, Emily received a lower rating than she deserved.

The Tangible and Intangible Costs:

• Demotivation and Reduced Productivity: Feeling undervalued and overlooked, Emily's motivation took a hit. Her productivity levels dropped, and she became less engaged in team projects. The cost to the company? Reduced output and the potential loss of innovative ideas that Emily might have brought to the table.

• Decreased Trust in Management: Emily's trust in the management and the appraisal process was eroded. She felt that her efforts throughout the year were in vain, leading to a sense of disillusionment. When employees lose trust in the system, they are less likely to take initiatives or go the extra mile, impacting overall team morale and cohesion.

• Increased Turnover: Disheartened by the unfair appraisal, Emily began exploring opportunities outside the company. Within a few months, she accepted an offer from a competitor. The company not only lost a valuable employee but also had to bear the costs of hiring and training a replacement. According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), the cost of replacing an employee can range from 50% to 60% of the employee's annual salary, with overall costs associated with turnover ranging from 90% to 200% of the annual salary.

• Stunted Growth and Missed Feedback Opportunities: On the flip side, if a manager's biases lead to an overly positive review for an underperforming employee, it deprives that employee of crucial feedback. Without knowing areas of improvement, the employee misses out on growth opportunities, and the organization suffers from subpar performance.

In short, biases in performance appraisals don't just affect the performance appraisal process individual being reviewed; they have ripple effects throughout the organization. Addressing these biases head-on ensures a fair, transparent, and productive evaluation process that benefits both the employees and the organization.

How Can You Reduce Performance Review Bias?

Prevent Performance Review Biases with Performance Management Tools and ONA

ONA is a sophisticated tool that maps and analyzes both formal and informal relationships within an organization. It delves deep into the dynamics of the workplace, uncovering patterns of communication, collaboration, and influence that might not be immediately visible.

Key Questions in ONA:
To get a holistic understanding of these relationships, ONA poses specific questions to employees, such as:

• Help and Advice: "Who do you go to for help and advice?" This question identifies the go-to individuals in the organization, the ones who are seen as knowledgeable and approachable.

• Motivation and Energy: "Who energizes or motivates you?" By answering this, employees highlight those who bring positivity and drive to the workplace, the individuals who inspire and uplift their colleagues.

• Outstanding Contributors: "Who do you see as an outstanding contributor?" This helps pinpoint the high-achievers and top performers, those who consistently deliver and drive results.

• Support and Attention: "Who do you believe needs additional support or attention?" This question is crucial as it helps identify employees who might be struggling or need further guidance, ensuring that they receive the necessary support to thrive.

Use Advanced Tools and ONA:

Modern performance management tools, combined with the insights from Organizational Network Analysis (ONA), can provide objective data and insights. For employees performance for instance, while traditional reviews might bias towards employees who are good self-promoters or manage up, ONA can identify the "quiet contributors" who might not be vocal in meetings but play crucial roles behind the scenes. These are the employees who consistently assist colleagues and have a significant impact on projects, even if they aren't the ones always in the spotlight.

Aggregate Performance Snapshots Over Time

Develop a Holistic View of Performance with ONA:

Instead of basing evaluations on recent events or isolated incidents, managers should look at an employee's performance over an extended period. By aggregating data over time and using ONA to understand the intricate web of interactions and contributions, managers can get a more accurate picture of an employee's consistent contributions, achievements, and areas of improvement.

Create Performance Snapshots

Regular Data Capture and ONA Insights:

Just as a photographer captures moments in time, managers should regularly capture performance data of their employees. This can include project outcomes, feedback from peers, client testimonials, and other relevant metrics. Over time, these snapshots, when viewed through the lens of ONA, can provide a comprehensive picture of an employee's contributions, helping managers make more informed decisions during reviews.

Collect Reviews Holistically

Incorporate Various Aspects and ONA:

A well-rounded review should consider all facets of an employee's role. This includes not just their primary responsibilities but also their teamwork, communication skills, adaptability, and other soft skills. Traditional 360 reviews might suffer from selection bias, where employees cherry-pick their reviewers. However, ONA can provide a more objective view of an employee's network and interactions, ensuring a holistic understanding of their performance.

Moreover, when using a 5-point rating scale in performance reviews, a significant majority of employees tend to receive scores of 3s and 4s. This clustering makes it challenging for organizations to distinguish between top and bottom performers. ONA can be instrumental in this scenario by highlighting the actual impact and contributions of employees, allowing for a more nuanced and accurate evaluation.

How It Works: The Power of Organizational Network Analysis (ONA)

ONA offers a solution to the challenges presented by bias. It maps and analyzes formal and informal relationships within an organization. By asking questions like "Who do you go to for advice?" or "Who motivates you?", ONA provides a holistic view of how employees interact and contribute. The modern workplace has evolved from a physical space to a network of interactions. With remote work and digital communication becoming the norm, managers no longer have the same visibility they once did. ONA bridges this gap, offering insights into the true impact and needs of employees.

Spotting the Hidden Gems and Areas of Concern

Consider two scenarios:

• Positive Manager and Network Perception: Jane is a team player. Both her manager and colleagues see her as a valuable contributor. She consistently delivers quality work and is the go-to person for advice. Using ONA, the manager can validate these observations and consider Jane for a promotion or a leadership role.
• Negative Manager and Network Perception: John struggles with deadlines. Both his manager and peers have raised concerns about his performance. ONA can help pinpoint specific areas where John needs support, allowing the manager to provide constructive feedback and tailored training.

However, ONA can also reveal discrepancies:

• Positive Network but Negative Manager Perception: Mike is not vocal in meetings and often goes unnoticed by his manager. However, ONA shows that he is a "quiet contributor", frequently assisting colleagues and playing a crucial role behind the scenes. In this case, the manager can acknowledge Mike's contributions and provide opportunities for him to shine.
• Negative Network but Positive Manager Perception: Lisa is excellent at managing up and has a good rapport with her manager. However, ONA indicates that her peers find her difficult to work with. The manager can address this feedback with Lisa, helping her improve her team dynamics.

Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) serves as a transformative tool in the realm of performance evaluations. By shedding light on the intricate web of relationships and interactions within an organization, ONA ensures that evaluations are grounded in objective data rather than subjective biases. Whether it's recognizing the unsung heroes or addressing potential areas of concern, ONA empowers managers to make informed, fair, and impactful decisions that drive both individual and organizational success.

Influencing Promotion Decisions

Promotion decisions can significantly impact employee retention. A study of LinkedIn data revealed that employees promoted within three years had a 70% chance of staying with the company. By leveraging ONA, managers can identify top performers, even those who might be "hidden" due to their quiet nature or lack of self-promotion. This ensures that deserving employees are recognized and given growth opportunities, reducing turnover and boosting morale.

Improving Retention and Employee Experience

A fair and comprehensive performance review process directly contributes to a positive employee experience. When employees feel that their contributions are recognized and valued, they're more likely to remain engaged and loyal to the organization. This not only boosts morale but also has tangible benefits for the company. Reduced turnover means the organization can save significantly on rehiring and training costs. A prime example of this is Chipotle. When they shifted their focus to internal hiring for managerial positions, they witnessed a significant drop in manager turnover rates. This shift underscores the immense value in recognizing and nurturing internal talent.

Conclusion

Organizational Network Analysis and a keen understanding of biases are game-changers for employee performance reviews. They offer a more comprehensive view of employee contributions, ensuring that feedback is accurate, promotions are deserved, and support is provided where needed. By embracing these tools and insights, organizations can foster a more inclusive, productive, and positive work environment.

‍

FAQ on Addressing Biases in Performance Reviews:

What challenges do most organizations face with traditional performance appraisals?

Most organizations struggle with biases in annual reviews, affecting employee engagement and the company culture.

‍How can biases in performance reviews impact top talent within the organization?

Biases can demotivate top talent, leading to reduced trust in human resources and decreased leadership qualities.

What is the Recency Effect in day to day work evaluations?

The Recency Effect refers to the tendency of business leaders to remember recent events, leading to evaluations based on recent achievements rather than an employee's day to day work over the entire review period.

What is Organizational Network Analysis (ONA), and how does it promote sharing feedback?

ONA maps and analyzes organizational networks, providing a better understanding of formal structure and information flow. It promotes sharing feedback and combining expertise for promoting rapid innovation.

How can ONA influence promoting rapid innovation within teams?

By leveraging ONA, business leaders can identify people crucial for promoting rapid innovation and ensure that deserving employees receive regular feedback.

What are the best practices for addressing biases in performance reviews?

Addressing biases ensures a fair evaluation process, fostering best practices for employee experience, problem-solving, and improving performance.

How can ONA help in identifying central connectors and high performers?

ONA provides insights into the company's formal structure, helping to identify central connectors, top performers, and high performers crucial for achieving organizational goals.

How does research show the importance of addressing biases for the well-being of employees?

Research shows that fair appraisals lead to improved well-being, reduced collaborative overload, and better alignment with organizational goals.

‍